Journal: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Article Title: A fair and EMG-validated comparison of recruitment criteria, musculotendon models and muscle coordination strategies, for the inverse-dynamics based optimization of muscle forces during gait

doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00806-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean across subjects Pearson correlation coefficient r values between EMG vs. muscle activations (r < 0.40 underlined and r > 0.60 in italics) and computational time of the different approaches

Article Snippet: Matching between estimated muscle activations and EMG was quantified via cross-correlation using the Pearson correlation coefficient r (Matlab’s function corrcoef ) with a maximum time delay of 150 ms [ ].

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Article Title: A fair and EMG-validated comparison of recruitment criteria, musculotendon models and muscle coordination strategies, for the inverse-dynamics based optimization of muscle forces during gait

doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00806-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: p-value for paired sample t-test for the Pearson correlation coefficient r between across-subjects mean (p < 0.05 underlined, NA: not applicable)

Article Snippet: Matching between estimated muscle activations and EMG was quantified via cross-correlation using the Pearson correlation coefficient r (Matlab’s function corrcoef ) with a maximum time delay of 150 ms [ ].

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Article Title: A fair and EMG-validated comparison of recruitment criteria, musculotendon models and muscle coordination strategies, for the inverse-dynamics based optimization of muscle forces during gait

doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00806-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean across muscles Pearson correlation coefficient r values between EMG vs. muscle activations (r > 0.60 in italics)

Article Snippet: Matching between estimated muscle activations and EMG was quantified via cross-correlation using the Pearson correlation coefficient r (Matlab’s function corrcoef ) with a maximum time delay of 150 ms [ ].

Techniques: Muscles

Journal: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Article Title: A fair and EMG-validated comparison of recruitment criteria, musculotendon models and muscle coordination strategies, for the inverse-dynamics based optimization of muscle forces during gait

doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00806-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: p-value for paired sample t-test for the Pearson correlation coefficient r between across-muscles mean (p < 0.05 underlined, NA: not applicable)

Article Snippet: Matching between estimated muscle activations and EMG was quantified via cross-correlation using the Pearson correlation coefficient r (Matlab’s function corrcoef ) with a maximum time delay of 150 ms [ ].

Techniques:

Journal: BMC Plant Biology

Article Title: Isolation, characterization and screening of phosphate (P) solubilizing actinomycetes and exploring its potency in finger millet ( Eleusine coracana L .)

doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06385-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of different growth parameters in finger millet as influenced by isolated actinomycetes. SDW = Shoot dry weight, SPU = Shoot P uptake, RV = Root volume, RL = Root length, RDW = Root dry weight, RPU = Root P Uptake, PLH = Plant height, CHL = Chlorophyll content, SAP = Soil available phosphorous, APA = Acid phosphatase activity

Article Snippet: Pearson correlation coefficient (r) using R studio was estimated between different growth parameters in finger millet (Fig. ) where a significant variation (more towards blue colour) with respect to application of isolated actinomycetes was recorded.

Techniques: Isolation, Activity Assay